<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: status update (3/27/2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/</link>
	<description>musings and other goodies</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Chi</title>
		<link>http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Chi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>good summary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good summary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Messina</title>
		<link>http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Messina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brynnevans.com/blog/2008/03/27/status-update-3272008/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>I think your use of ScreenFlow is pretty interesting here. It might be useful to call out why your participants are using it instead of, say, iShowU, and maybe what platforms (Mac, Windows) folks are using? Is there a higher likelihood for sharing behavior to exist based on the fundamental design of these systems?

The mTurk stuff is also very interesting and surprising -- I would not have expected such a mechanism to elicit such a positive response, but that's great validation of the resource!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your use of ScreenFlow is pretty interesting here. It might be useful to call out why your participants are using it instead of, say, iShowU, and maybe what platforms (Mac, Windows) folks are using? Is there a higher likelihood for sharing behavior to exist based on the fundamental design of these systems?</p>
<p>The mTurk stuff is also very interesting and surprising &#8212; I would not have expected such a mechanism to elicit such a positive response, but that&#8217;s great validation of the resource!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
